You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting tree biomass growth in the temperate–boreal ecotone: Is tree size, age, competition, or climate response most important?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.13208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane R Foster, Andrew O Finley, Anthony W D'Amato, John B Bradford, Sudipto Banerjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 50% |
| Canada | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 52 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,612,793
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#3,264
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,952
of 316,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#32
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.