| Title |
Spatial positioning of individuals in a group of feral horses: a case study using drone technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammal Research, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13364-018-0400-2 |
| Authors |
Sota Inoue, Shinya Yamamoto, Monamie Ringhofer, Renata S. Mendonça, Carlos Pereira, Satoshi Hirata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 37% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,925,893
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#74
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,600
of 350,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.