↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic Analysis of Vertically Transmitted Psyllid Endosymbionts (Candidatus Carsonella ruddii) Based on atpAGD and rpoC: Comparisons with 16S–23S rDNA-Derived Phylogeny

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
19 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Phylogenetic Analysis of Vertically Transmitted Psyllid Endosymbionts (Candidatus Carsonella ruddii) Based on atpAGD and rpoC: Comparisons with 16S–23S rDNA-Derived Phylogeny
Published in
Current Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s002840010240
Pubmed ID
Authors

MyLo L. Thao, Marta A. Clark, Daniel H. Burckhardt, Nancy A. Moran, Paul Baumann

Abstract

Psyllids are insects that harbor endosymbionts (Candidatuus Carsonella ruddii) within specialized cells found in the insect's body cavity. Previous phylogenetic analyses based on endosymbiont 16S-23S ribosomal DNA and a host gene were concordant (M.L. Thao, et al., Appl. Env. Microbiol. 66:2898, 2000). Additional analyses with atpAGD and rpoBC gave similar trees showing the agreement expected from organisms that evolve through vertical transmission with no gene exchange.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 60 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,707,547
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#202
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,824
of 227,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.