| Title |
Adverse Effects of Smoking on Postoperative Outcomes in Cancer Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-011-2128-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Csaba Gajdos, Mary T. Hawn, Elizabeth J. Campagna, William G. Henderson, Jasvinder A. Singh, Thomas Houston |
| Abstract |
The possible negative effects of smoking on postoperative outcomes have not been well studied in cancer patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,411,203
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,595
of 6,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,669
of 142,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.