| Title |
Assessing whether universal coverage with insecticide-treated nets has been achieved: is the right indicator being used?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-018-2505-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Koenker, Fred Arnold, Fatou Ba, Moustapha Cisse, Lamine Diouf, Erin Eckert, Marcy Erskine, Lia Florey, Megan Fotheringham, Lilia Gerberg, Christian Lengeler, Matthew Lynch, Abraham Mnzava, Susann Nasr, Médoune Ndiop, Stephen Poyer, Melanie Renshaw, Estifanos Shargie, Cameron Taylor, Julie Thwing, Suzanne Van Hulle, Yazoumé Ye, Josh Yukich, Albert Kilian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,502,535
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,113
of 5,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,766
of 346,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#22
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.