| Title |
Photobiomodulation on critical bone defects of rat calvaria: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10103-018-2653-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Brassolatti, Ana Laura Martins de Andrade, Paulo Sérgio Bossini, Daiana Laurenci Orth, Fernanda Oliveira Duarte, Ana Beatriz dos Anjos Souza, Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto, Fernanda de Freitas Anibal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,536,001
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#1,089
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,155
of 346,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.