↓ Skip to main content

Reply to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning “Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator” by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur…

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Reply to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning “Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator” by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9)
Published in
European Spine Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5784-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. F. Kasparek, F. Boettner, A. Rienmueller, M. Weber, P. T. Funovics, P. Krepler, R. Windhager, J. Grohs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,651,503
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,511
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,771
of 346,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#70
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.