| Title |
The impact of climate change on radiological practices in Italy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal Plus, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjp/i2018-12243-3 |
| Authors |
G. M. Contessa, M. Guardati, M. D’Arienzo, C. Poggi, S. Sandri, M. C. D’Auria, E. Genovese, V. Cannatà |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 40% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 20% |
| Engineering | 2 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 10% |
| Design | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,833,526
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal Plus
#193
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,831
of 340,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal Plus
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.