↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal Characterization of the Cellular and Molecular Contributors to Liver Fibrosis in a Murine Hepatotoxic-Injury Model

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pathology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatiotemporal Characterization of the Cellular and Molecular Contributors to Liver Fibrosis in a Murine Hepatotoxic-Injury Model
Published in
American Journal of Pathology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.10.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Melino, Victoria L. Gadd, Kylie A. Alexander, Lynette Beattie, Katie E. Lineburg, Michelle Martinez, Bianca Teal, Laetitia Le Texier, Katharine M. Irvine, Gregory C. Miller, Glen M. Boyle, Geoffrey R. Hill, Andrew D. Clouston, Elizabeth E. Powell, Kelli P.A. MacDonald

Abstract

The interplay between the inflammatory infiltrate and tissue resident cell populations invokes fibrogenesis. However, the temporal and mechanistic contributions of these cells to fibrosis are obscure. To address this issue, liver inflammation, ductular reaction (DR), and fibrosis were induced in C57BL/6 mice by thioacetamide administration for up to 12 weeks. Thioacetamide treatment induced two phases of liver fibrosis. A rapid pericentral inflammatory infiltrate enriched in F4/80(+) monocytes co-localized with SMA(+) myofibroblasts resulted in early collagen deposition, marking the start of an initial fibrotic phase (1 to 6 weeks). An expansion of bone marrow-derived macrophages preceded a second phase, characterized by accelerated progression of fibrosis (>6 weeks) after DR migration from the portal tracts to the centrilobular site of injury, in association with an increase in DR/macrophage interactions. Although chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) mRNA was induced rapidly in response to thioacetamide, CCL2 deficiency only partially abrogated fibrosis. In contrast, colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor blockade diminished C-C chemokine receptor type 2 [CCR2(neg) (Ly6C(lo))] monocytes, attenuated the DR, and significantly reduced fibrosis, illustrating the critical role of colony-stimulating factor 1-dependent monocyte/macrophage differentiation and linking the two phases of injury. In response to liver injury, colony-stimulating factor 1 drives early monocyte-mediated myofibroblast activation and collagen deposition, subsequent macrophage differentiation, and their association with the advancing DR, the formation of fibrotic septa, and the progression of liver fibrosis to cirrhosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,978,129
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#4,628
of 5,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,160
of 401,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#47
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.