↓ Skip to main content

Carers’ views on patient self‐care in chronic heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carers’ views on patient self‐care in chronic heart failure
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/jocn.13124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Cameron, Kerryn L Rhodes, Chantal F Ski, David R Thompson

Abstract

To examine carers' views on patient self-care in chronic heart failure (CHF). Self-care, a key strategy in the long-term management of CHF, can be complex and difficult to master. Carers play a key role in supporting patients in self-care, yet their views on it are rarely sought. A qualitative approach was adopted with a purposeful sample of carers of patients with CHF residing in Australia. Carers who identified themselves as providing informal care to a person diagnosed with chronic heart failure were interviewed about their views on patient self-care. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews with a semi-structured interview guide. Qualitative content analysis of the interviews was undertaken by two nurses and one psychologist. Four key themes were identified pertaining to CHF patient self-care: hindrance to engagement; roles and relationships; social support and community engagement and competency. Most carers viewed patients' fatigue and inactivity, mood and coping, and memory loss as major challenges to engagement in self-care. They viewed emotional support and encouragement, independence and organised routines as important aspects of their relationship with the patient and as facilitators of self-care, but also required for themselves support from their families, communities and healthcare professionals. They also viewed patient and carer experience and knowledge as being essential to successful self-care. Carers viewed self-care as an important issue for patients with CHF and indicated that they could play an enhanced role with the provision of better support and knowledge from their families, communities and health care professionals. Carers are closely involved in supporting patients in CHF self-care, even though their views are rarely considered in the organisation and delivery of heart failure management programmes. Therefore, their important contribution should be acknowledged and supported in contemporary heart failure health services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 35 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 33%
Psychology 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#19,977,226
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,711
of 5,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,510
of 400,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#55
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.