You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Burnout of Radiologists: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Remedies: A Report of the ACR Commission on Human Resources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American College of Radiology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.11.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jay A. Harolds, Jay R. Parikh, Edward I. Bluth, Sharon C. Dutton, Michael P. Recht |
| Abstract |
Burnout is a concern for radiologists. The burnout rate is greater among diagnostic radiologists than the mean for all physicians, while radiation oncologists have a slightly lower burnout rate. Burnout can result in unprofessional behavior, thoughts of suicide, premature retirement, and errors in patient care. Strategies to reduce burnout include addressing the sources of job dissatisfaction, instilling lifestyle balance, finding reasons to work other than money, improving money management, developing a support group, and seeking help when needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 63% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 31% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Psychology | 18 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,102,567
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#216
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,041
of 399,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.