↓ Skip to main content

Biased sampling of methane release from northern lakes: A problem for extrapolation

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biased sampling of methane release from northern lakes: A problem for extrapolation
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/2015gl066501
Authors

Martin Wik, Brett F. Thornton, David Bastviken, Jo Uhlbäck, Patrick M. Crill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 29 23%
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 10%
Chemistry 5 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,713,389
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#4,980
of 22,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,603
of 411,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#69
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.