| Title |
Beyond the characterization of wine aroma compounds: looking for analytical approaches in trying to understand aroma perception during wine consumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-011-5078-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Muñoz-González, Juan J. Rodríguez-Bencomo, M. Victoria Moreno-Arribas, M. Ángeles Pozo-Bayón |
| Abstract |
The volatile compounds present in wines are responsible for the quality of the wine aroma. The analysis of these compounds requires different analytical techniques depending on the type of compounds and their concentration. The importance at sensorial level of each compound should be evaluated by using olfactometric techniques and reconstitution and omission studies. In addition, wine aroma is influenced by other factors such as wine matrix, which could affect the compounds' volatility, decreasing or increasing their concentration in the headspace above the wine. Moreover, when a wine is consumed, several oral physiological variables could affect aroma perception. The focus of this review is to outline the most recent advances in wine aroma analysis and the most innovative techniques in trying to elucidate the main factors that influence wine aroma perception during consumption. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 31% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 24% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,601
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,701
of 122,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#80
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.