| Title |
Evidence is stronger than you think: a meta-analysis of vitamin C use in patients with sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2191-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 264 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 15% |
| Mexico | 23 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 8% |
| Spain | 13 | 5% |
| Colombia | 7 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 101 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 197 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 16% |
| Scientists | 22 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#175,488
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#72
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,495
of 358,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.