| Title |
Analysis of particulate exposure during continuous drug infusion in critically ill adult patients: a preliminary proof-of-concept in vitro study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-018-0205-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malik Benlabed, Anthony Martin Mena, Romain Gaudy, Maxime Perez, Stéphanie Genay, Jean-Daniel Hecq, Pascal Odou, Gilles Lebuffe, Bertrand Décaudin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| France | 2 | 25% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,993,710
of 23,552,911 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#159
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,426
of 347,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,552,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.