↓ Skip to main content

Introducing the ‘Drucebo’ effect in statin therapy: a systematic review of studies comparing reported rates of statin‐associated muscle symptoms, under blinded and open‐label conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Introducing the ‘Drucebo’ effect in statin therapy: a systematic review of studies comparing reported rates of statin‐associated muscle symptoms, under blinded and open‐label conditions
Published in
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/jcsm.12344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter E. Penson, G. B. John Mancini, Peter P. Toth, Seth S. Martin, Gerald F. Watts, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Dimitri P. Mikhailidis, Maciej Banach, on behalf of Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta‐Analysis Collaboration Group & International Lipid Expert Panel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,601,146
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
#200
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,730
of 357,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.