| Title |
Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeochemistry, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10533-018-0509-z |
| Authors |
Benjamin N. Sulman, Jessica A. M. Moore, Rose Abramoff, Colin Averill, Stephanie Kivlin, Katerina Georgiou, Bhavya Sridhar, Melannie D. Hartman, Gangsheng Wang, William R. Wieder, Mark A. Bradford, Yiqi Luo, Melanie A. Mayes, Eric Morrison, William J. Riley, Alejandro Salazar, Joshua P. Schimel, Jinyun Tang, Aimée T. Classen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 45 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 31 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 267 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 24% |
| Researcher | 56 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 90 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#964,625
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#28
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,584
of 360,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.