↓ Skip to main content

Impact of the use of local fidaxomicin treatment algorithms for managing Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients in southeastern United States

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Impact of the use of local fidaxomicin treatment algorithms for managing Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients in southeastern United States
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12941-018-0288-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan C. Cho, Sandy J. Estrada, Jamie J. Kisgen, Angelina Davis, Laura Puzniak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,651,503
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#461
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,771
of 346,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.