| Title |
Association between diuretics and successful discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2192-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junseok Jeon, Do Hee Kim, Song In Baeg, Eun Jeong Lee, Chi Ryang Chung, Kyeongman Jeon, Jung Eun Lee, Wooseong Huh, Gee Young Suh, Yoon-Goo Kim, Dae Joong Kim, Ha Young Oh, Hye Ryoun Jang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Mexico | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,244,686
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,026
of 6,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,165
of 358,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.