| Title |
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie L Prady, Eleonora P Uphoff, Madeleine Power, Su Golder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 19% |
| United States | 10 | 14% |
| Canada | 6 | 9% |
| Cameroon | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 61% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 17% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Librarian | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#799,734
of 25,032,929 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#66
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,503
of 353,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,032,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.