| Title |
A comprehensive regional neurochemical theory in depression: a protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of 1H-MRS studies in major depressive disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0830-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Drago, Patrick W O’Regan, Ivan Welaratne, Shane Rooney, Aoife O’Callaghan, Marissa Malkit, Elena Roman, Kirk J Levins, Lauren Alexander, Denis Barry, Erik O’Hanlon, Veronica O’Keane, Darren William Roddy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,486,007
of 25,074,338 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,084
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,780
of 353,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#35
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,074,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.