↓ Skip to main content

Stigma in Male Depression and Suicide: A Canadian Sex Comparison Study

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,392)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
231 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Stigma in Male Depression and Suicide: A Canadian Sex Comparison Study
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10597-015-9986-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

John L. Oliffe, John S. Ogrodniczuk, Susan J. Gordon, Genevieve Creighton, Mary T. Kelly, Nick Black, Corey Mackenzie

Abstract

Stigma in men's depression and suicide can restrict help-seeking, reduce treatment compliance and deter individuals from confiding in friends and family. In this article we report sex comparison findings from a national survey of English-speaking adult Canadians about stigmatized beliefs concerning male depression and suicide. Among respondents without direct experience of depression or suicide (n = 541) more than a third endorsed the view that men with depression are unpredictable. Overall, a greater proportion of males endorsed stigmatizing views about male depression compared to female respondents. A greater proportion of female respondents endorsed items indicating that men who suicide are disconnected, lost and lonely. Male and female respondents with direct personal experience of depression or suicide (n = 360) strongly endorsed stigmatizing attitudes toward themselves and a greater proportion of male respondents indicated that they would be embarrassed about seeking help for depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 231 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 260 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 18%
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Researcher 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 84 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Social Sciences 18 7%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 93 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#147,431
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#2
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,359
of 402,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.