↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes for women after obstetric fistula repair in Lilongwe, Malawi: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Long-term outcomes for women after obstetric fistula repair in Lilongwe, Malawi: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0755-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura B. Drew, Jeffrey P. Wilkinson, William Nundwe, Margaret Moyo, Ronald Mataya, Mwawi Mwale, Jennifer H. Tang

Abstract

Obstetric fistula affects a woman's life physically, psychosocially, and economically. Although surgery can repair the physical damage of fistula, the devastating consequences that affect a woman's quality of life may persist when she reintegrates into her community. This qualitative study assessed long-term outcomes among women who underwent obstetric fistula repair in Malawi. We explored three domains: overall quality of life before and after repair, fertility and pregnancy outcomes after repair, and understanding of fistula. In-depth interviews were conducted in Chichewa with 20 women from seven districts across Central Malawi. All women were interviewed 1 to 2 years after surgical repair for obstetric fistula at the Fistula Care Centre in Lilongwe, Malawi. Interviews were independently coded and analyzed using content analysis. About half of women were married and nine of 20 women reported some degree of urinary incontinence. With the exception of relationship challenges, women's concerns before and after repair were different. Additionally, repair had resolved many of the concerns women had before repair. However, challenges, both directly and indirectly related to fistula, persisted. Improvements in quality of life at the individual level included feelings of freedom, confidence and personal growth, and improved income-earning ability. Interpersonal quality of life improvements included improved relationships with family and friends, reduced stigma, and increased participation with their communities. Nearly half of women desired future pregnancies, but many were uncertain about their ability to bear children and feared additional pregnancies could cause fistula recurrence. Most women were well informed about fistula development but myths about witchcraft and fear of delivery were present. Nearly all women would recommend fistula repair to other women, and many were advocates in their communities. Nearly all women believed their quality of life had improved at the individual and interpersonal levels since fistula repair, even among women who continued to have urinary incontinence. Contrary to other studies, women reported they were welcomed back by their communities and had limited challenges when reintegrating. Despite the overall improvements in quality of life, many continued to have relationship problems and were concerned about future fertility. These issues need to be further explored in other studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 46 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 54 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,816,364
of 25,035,235 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,125
of 4,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,509
of 405,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#35
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,035,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.