| Title |
Large scale highly organized single-walled carbon nanotube networks for electrical devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00339-009-5194-2 |
| Authors |
Laila Jaber-Ansari, Myung Gwan Hahm, Tae Hoon Kim, Sivasubramanian Somu, Ahmed Busnaina, Yung Joon Jung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 31% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 4 | 31% |
| Engineering | 2 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#156
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,028
of 107,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.