| Title |
Efficacy and safety of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-018-3418-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Changcheng Shi, Yubo Xiao, Qi Zhang, Qingyu Li, Fei Wang, Jing Wu, Nengming Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Jordan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,032,255
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#978
of 8,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,248
of 353,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#17
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.