↓ Skip to main content

Genomic prediction for numerically small breeds, using models with pre-selected and differentially weighted markers

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Genomic prediction for numerically small breeds, using models with pre-selected and differentially weighted markers
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12711-018-0419-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biaty Raymond, Aniek C. Bouwman, Yvonne C. J. Wientjes, Chris Schrooten, Jeanine Houwing-Duistermaat, Roel F. Veerkamp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,834,208
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#112
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,644
of 356,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.