↓ Skip to main content

Gene selection and cloning approaches for co-expression and production of recombinant protein–protein complexes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Gene selection and cloning approaches for co-expression and production of recombinant protein–protein complexes
Published in
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10969-015-9200-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

György Babnigg, Robert Jedrzejczak, Boguslaw Nocek, Adam Stein, William Eschenfeldt, Lucy Stols, Norman Marshall, Alicia Weger, Ruiying Wu, Mark Donnelly, Andrzej Joachimiak

Abstract

Multiprotein complexes play essential roles in all cells and X-ray crystallography can provide unparalleled insight into their structure and function. Many of these complexes are believed to be sufficiently stable for structural biology studies, but the production of protein-protein complexes using recombinant technologies is still labor-intensive. We have explored several strategies for the identification and cloning of heterodimers and heterotrimers that are compatible with the high-throughput (HTP) structural biology pipeline developed for single proteins. Two approaches are presented and compared which resulted in co-expression of paired genes from a single expression vector. Native operons encoding predicted interacting proteins were selected from a repertoire of genomes, and cloned directly to expression vector. In an alternative approach, Helicobacter pylori proteins predicted to interact strongly were cloned, each associated with translational control elements, then linked into an artificial operon. Proteins were then expressed and purified by standard HTP protocols, resulting to date in the structure determination of two H. pylori complexes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,434,182
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#87
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,667
of 390,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them