| Title |
A cost analysis of intensified vs conventional multifactorial therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the Steno-2 study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-018-4739-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joachim Gæde, Jens Oellgaard, Rikke Ibsen, Peter Gæde, Emil Nørtoft, Hans-Henrik Parving, Jakob Kjellberg, Oluf Pedersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 34% |
| India | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#888,432
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#454
of 5,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,008
of 359,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.