| Title |
Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trees, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00468-010-0452-7 |
| Authors |
Thomas Hilker, Martin van Leeuwen, Nicholas C. Coops, Michael A. Wulder, Glenn J. Newnham, David L. B. Jupp, Darius S. Culvenor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Ghana | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 22% |
| Researcher | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 57 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 21% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,482,715
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#18
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,052
of 109,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.