| Title |
Artemisinin production in Artemisia annua: studies in planta and results of a novel delivery method for treating malaria and other neglected diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-010-9166-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pamela J. Weathers, Patrick R. Arsenault, Patrick S. Covello, Anthony McMickle, Keat H. Teoh, Darwin W. Reed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Uganda | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,343,654
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#14
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,340
of 102,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.