↓ Skip to main content

Does No-Touch Technique Better than Conventional or Intermediate Saphenous Vein Harvest Techniques for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Does No-Touch Technique Better than Conventional or Intermediate Saphenous Vein Harvest Techniques for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12265-018-9832-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdelrahman Elshafay, Ahmed Hesham Bendary, Huan Thanh Vuong, Ahmed Reda Ahmed, Mohamed Ashraf Mokhtar, Ali Lotfy Soliman, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Israa Atia El bestawi, Nirmeen Atef Abdallah, Vi Tuong Vu, Kenji Hirayama, Nguyen Tien Huy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,254,575
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#494
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,633
of 346,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.