↓ Skip to main content

Defining Goals and Criteria for Ecosystem-Based Management

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, July 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Defining Goals and Criteria for Ecosystem-Based Management
Published in
Environmental Management, July 1998
DOI 10.1007/s002679900121
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Scott Slocombe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 21%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 10%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#811
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,854
of 33,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them