↓ Skip to main content

How Ancient Egyptian Scribes Dealt with Line-ends

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Ancient Egyptian Scribes Dealt with Line-ends
Published in
Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, January 2010
DOI 10.5356/jorient.53.161
Authors

Masakatsu NAGAI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,870,196
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#117
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,191
of 173,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.