↓ Skip to main content

Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 4,932)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
238 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x683425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Doran, Fiona Fox, Karen Rodham, Gordon Taylor, Michael Harris

Abstract

The loss of GPs in the early stages of their careers is contributing to the GP workforce crisis. Recruitment in the UK remains below the numbers needed to support the demand for GP care. To explore the reasons why GPs leave general practice early. A mixed methods study using online survey data triangulated with qualitative interviews. Participants were GPs aged <50 years who had left the English Medical Performers List in the last 5 years (2009-2014). A total of 143 early GP leavers participated in an online survey, of which 21 took part in recorded telephone interviews. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data using thematic analysis techniques. Reasons for leaving were cumulative and multifactorial. Organisational changes to the NHS have led to an increase in administrative tasks and overall workload that is perceived by GP participants to have fundamentally changed the doctor-patient relationship. Lack of time with patients has compromised the ability to practise more patient-centred care, and, with it, GPs' sense of professional autonomy and values, resulting in diminished job satisfaction. In this context, the additional pressures of increased patient demand and the negative media portrayal left many feeling unsupported and vulnerable to burnout and ill health, and, ultimately, to the decision to leave general practice. To improve retention of young GPs, the pace of administrative change needs to be minimised and the time spent by GPs on work that is not face-to-face patient care reduced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 238 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 34%
Psychology 23 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 6%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 249. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#151,382
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#49
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,416
of 402,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.