↓ Skip to main content

Close Encounters of the First Kind: Innate Sensors and Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Close Encounters of the First Kind: Innate Sensors and Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12035-015-9665-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidia Fernández-Paredes, Rebeca Pérez de Diego, Clara de Andrés, Silvia Sánchez-Ramón

Abstract

Although autoimmune diseases by definition imply adaptive immune system pathologies, growing evidence points to the relevance of innate receptors in modulating the initiation and progression of the autoreactive response. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by central nervous system (CNS) demyelination, inflammation and axonal damage, in which the role of several pathogens such as herpes viruses have long been described as potential triggers. Encounters of these pathogens with altered innate receptors in susceptible individuals might drive pathological autoreactivity and inflammation, overcoming tolerance and causing subsequent CNS damage. In particular, functional and genetic studies reveal that Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and the Nod-like receptor (NLR) P3 could be involved in MS pathogenesis, whereas TLR3, the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM)-2 and the C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) MBL and MASP-3 would have a putative protective role. A better understanding of these interactions will provide important insights into the aetiopathogenesis of MS and could help design potential targets for novel therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,434,182
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,463
of 3,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,137
of 393,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#109
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.