↓ Skip to main content

A Programmed Anti‐Inflammatory Nanoscaffold (PAIN) as a 3D Tool to Understand the Brain Injury Response

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Programmed Anti‐Inflammatory Nanoscaffold (PAIN) as a 3D Tool to Understand the Brain Injury Response
Published in
Advanced Materials, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/adma.201805209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca L. Maclean, Georgina M. Ims, Malcolm K. Horne, Richard J. Williams, David R. Nisbet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 13%
Materials Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,375,009
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#1,230
of 14,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,728
of 344,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#35
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.