↓ Skip to main content

Androgen receptor expression predicts beneficial tamoxifen response in oestrogen receptor-α-negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Androgen receptor expression predicts beneficial tamoxifen response in oestrogen receptor-α-negative breast cancer
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2015.464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Hilborn, Jelena Gacic, Tommy Fornander, Bo Nordenskjöld, Olle Stål, Agneta Jansson

Abstract

Although the androgen receptor (AR) is frequently expressed in breast cancer, its relevance in the disease is not fully understood. In addition, the relevance of AR in determining tamoxifen treatment efficiency requires evaluation. To investigate the tamoxifen predictive relevance of the AR protein expression in breast cancer.MethodsPatients were randomised to tamoxifen 40 mg daily for 2 or 5 years or to no endocrine treatment. Mean follow-up was 15 years. Hazard ratios were calculated with recurrence-free survival as end point. In patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumours, expression of AR predicted decreased recurrence rate with tamoxifen (hazard ratio (HR)=0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.14-0.81; P=0.015), whereas the opposite was seen in the AR- group (HR=2.92; 95% CI=1.16-7.31; P=0.022). Interaction test was significant P<0.001. Patients with triple-negative and AR+ tumours benefitted from tamoxifen treatment (HR=0.12; 95% CI=0.014-0.95 P=0.044), whereas patients with AR- tumours had worse outcome when treated with tamoxifen (HR=3.98; 95% CI=1.32-12.03; P=0.014). Interaction test was significant P=0.003. Patients with ER+ tumours showed benefit from tamoxifen treatment regardless of AR expression. AR can predict tamoxifen treatment benefit in patients with ER- tumours and triple-negative breast cancer.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 7 January 2016; doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.464 www.bjcancer.com.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Chemistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,893,666
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#9,030
of 11,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,493
of 406,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#70
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.