↓ Skip to main content

A new in vitro lipid digestion – in vivo absorption model to evaluate the mechanisms of drug absorption from lipid-based formulations

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
A new in vitro lipid digestion – in vivo absorption model to evaluate the mechanisms of drug absorption from lipid-based formulations
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11095-015-1843-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew F. Crum, Natalie L. Trevaskis, Hywel D. Williams, Colin W. Pouton, Christopher J. H. Porter

Abstract

In vitro lipid digestion models are commonly used to screen lipid-based formulations (LBF), but in vitro-in vivo correlations are in some cases unsuccessful. Here we enhance the scope of the lipid digestion test by incorporating an absorption 'sink' into the experimental model. An in vitro model of lipid digestion was coupled directly to a single pass in situ intestinal perfusion experiment in an anaesthetised rat. The model allowed simultaneous real-time analysis of the digestion and absorption of LBFs of fenofibrate and was employed to evaluate the influence of formulation digestion, supersaturation and precipitation on drug absorption. Formulations containing higher quantities of co-solvent and surfactant resulted in higher supersaturation and more rapid drug precipitation in vitro when compared to those containing higher quantities of lipid. In contrast, when the same formulations were examined using the coupled in vitro lipid digestion - in vivo absorption model, drug flux into the mesenteric vein was similar regardless of in vitro formulation performance. For some drugs, simple in vitro lipid digestion models may underestimate the potential for absorption from LBFs. Consistent with recent in vivo studies, drug absorption for rapidly absorbed drugs such as fenofibrate may occur even when drug precipitation is apparent during in vitro digestion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 46%
Chemistry 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,017,932
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#175
of 2,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,988
of 392,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.