↓ Skip to main content

Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
Title
Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden
Published in
Ambio, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0749-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Felton, Urban Nilsson, Johan Sonesson, Annika M. Felton, Jean-Michel Roberge, Thomas Ranius, Martin Ahlström, Johan Bergh, Christer Björkman, Johanna Boberg, Lars Drössler, Nils Fahlvik, Peichen Gong, Emma Holmström, E. Carina H. Keskitalo, Maartje J. Klapwijk, Hjalmar Laudon, Tomas Lundmark, Mats Niklasson, Annika Nordin, Maria Pettersson, Jan Stenlid, Anna Sténs, Kristina Wallertz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 403 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 17%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 12%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 99 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 105 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Unspecified 11 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 122 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#954,828
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#146
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,385
of 403,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.