| Title |
Perforation of the Gastrointestinal Tract Secondary to Ingestion of Foreign Bodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-005-0490-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian K.P. Goh, Pierce K.H. Chow, Hak‐Mien Quah, Hock‐Soo Ong, Kong‐Weng Eu, London L.P.J. Ooi, Wai‐Keong Wong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 59% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,576,904
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,522
of 4,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,172
of 156,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.