| Title |
Suppressive Effects of N-Acetyl-d-Glucosamine on Rheumatoid Arthritis Mouse Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammation, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10753-012-9459-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazuo Azuma, Tomohiro Osaki, Takashi Wakuda, Takeshi Tsuka, Tomohiro Imagawa, Yoshiharu Okamoto, Saburo Minami |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,778,877
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation
#79
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,877
of 161,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.