| Title |
Using digital time-lapse cameras to monitor species-specific understorey and overstorey phenology in support of wildlife habitat assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10661-010-1768-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher W. Bater, Nicholas C. Coops, Michael A. Wulder, Thomas Hilker, Scott E. Nielsen, Greg McDermid, Gordon B. Stenhouse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 215 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 73 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,528,558
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#425
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,358
of 185,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.