| Title |
Increased lipolysis in LCHAD deficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10545-006-0296-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. U. Halldin, A. Forslund, U. von Döbeln, C. Eklund, J. Gustafsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 46% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,576,904
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#712
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,882
of 156,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.