↓ Skip to main content

Ultra-deep sequencing of VHSV isolates contributes to understanding the role of viral quasispecies

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Ultra-deep sequencing of VHSV isolates contributes to understanding the role of viral quasispecies
Published in
Veterinary Research, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13567-015-0298-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna A. Schönherz, Niels Lorenzen, Bernt Guldbrandtsen, Bart Buitenhuis, Katja Einer-Jensen

Abstract

The high mutation rate of RNA viruses enables the generation of a genetically diverse viral population, termed a quasispecies, within a single infected host. This high in-host genetic diversity enables an RNA virus to adapt to a diverse array of selective pressures such as host immune response and switching between host species. The negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus, viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV), was originally considered an epidemic virus of cultured rainbow trout in Europe, but was later proved to be endemic among a range of marine fish species in the Northern hemisphere. To better understand the nature of a virus quasispecies related to the evolutionary potential of VHSV, a deep-sequencing protocol specific to VHSV was established and applied to 4 VHSV isolates, 2 originating from rainbow trout and 2 from Atlantic herring. Each isolate was subjected to Illumina paired end shotgun sequencing after PCR amplification and the 11.1 kb genome was successfully sequenced with an average coverage of 0.5-1.9 × 10(6) sequenced copies. Differences in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequency were detected both within and between isolates, possibly related to their stage of adaptation to host species and host immune reactions. The N, M, P and Nv genes appeared nearly fixed, while genetic variation in the G and L genes demonstrated presence of diverse genetic populations particularly in two isolates. The results demonstrate that deep sequencing and analysis methodologies can be useful for future in vivo host adaption studies of VHSV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#1,035
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,207
of 400,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.