↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular transplantation of stem cells to the injured rat CNS

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular transplantation of stem cells to the injured rat CNS
Published in
Neuroradiology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00234-009-0551-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan Lundberg, Katarina Le Blanc, Mikael Söderman, Tommy Andersson, Staffan Holmin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#317
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,768
of 111,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them