| Title |
“Nuts and Bolts” of Laboratory Evaluation of Angioedema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12016-016-8539-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henriette Farkas, Nóra Veszeli, Erika Kajdácsi, László Cervenak, Lilian Varga |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 27% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 46% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,049,987
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#198
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,891
of 302,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.