| Title |
Radiation-induced cell death mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-010-0042-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Eriksson, Torgny Stigbrand |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 538 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 121 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 87 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 14% |
| Unknown | 109 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 84 | 15% |
| Unknown | 131 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,595,291
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#165
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,067
of 95,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them