| Title |
An Unusual Member of the Cdk Family: Cdk5
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10571-007-9242-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fatema A. Dhariwala, Medha S. Rajadhyaksha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,494,737
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#152
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,478
of 161,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them