Title |
The Science of Stapling and Leaks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Obesity Surgery, November 2004
|
DOI | 10.1381/0960892042583888 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Randal S Baker, James Foote, Paul Kemmeter, Randall Brady, Todd Vroegop, Matt Serveld |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 16 | 15% |
Researcher | 15 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 23 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 50% |
Engineering | 12 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,401,458
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#429
of 3,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,953
of 63,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.