↓ Skip to main content

A sulfated carbohydrate epitope inhibits axon regeneration after injury

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A sulfated carbohydrate epitope inhibits axon regeneration after injury
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1121318109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua M. Brown, Jiang Xia, BinQuan Zhuang, Kin-Sang Cho, Claude J. Rogers, Cristal I. Gama, Manish Rawat, Sarah E. Tully, Noriko Uetani, Daniel E. Mason, Michel L. Tremblay, Eric C. Peters, Osami Habuchi, Dong F. Chen, Linda C. Hsieh-Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 120 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 33%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 20%
Chemistry 23 18%
Neuroscience 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#67,601
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,705
of 172,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#582
of 859 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 859 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.